Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an agency relationship cannot exist unless the alleged principal “has the right to control the transaction”
• noting agency’s violation of its rules was “hardly a model of efficient decision-making,” but that appellant was required to show that such a violation caused him to lose a significant legal right rising to the level of a due process violation
• “Agency may be proven by an 25 express contract between the parties or by facts implying a contract.”
• “Agency may be proven by an express contract between the parties or by facts implying a contract.”
• “An administrative hearing is not a criminal proceeding. Otherwise inadmissible evidence such as hearsay may be considered. . . . In some circumstances, hearsay may even be the sole support of an administrative decision.”
• right to control transaction factor in determining agency relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).