Brown v. Arapahoe Drilling Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the fact that a driller participated in a ear pool with his crew, occasionally using company gas, was not enough to bring the deceased driller within the traveling employee exception
• referring to 1951 N.M. Laws, ch. 205, § 3, a predecessor of the current Section 52-5-17
• “[WJhatever right the employer or its insurer has to reimbursement follows payment of compensation, but does not precede it.”
• characterizing White as concerned with estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).