Brown v. Advocate South Suburban Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because a negative review did not have any actual consequences for plaintiff it was not materially adverse
• holding that “‘[p]ersonality conflicts at work that generate antipathy and snubbing by supervisors and co-workers are not actionable’ under Title VII”
• holding that denying a transfer could be an adverse action, “provided the transfer would have resulted in higher pay or benefits”
• explaining that evidence of bias does not support an inference of unlawful discrimination without evidence of a discriminatory motive
• explaining that evidence of bias does not support an inference of unlawful discrimination without evidence of a discriminatory motive
• explaining that the denial of a transfer would only be a materially adverse action if “the transfer would have resulted in higher pay or benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).