Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co. v. O. S. Walker Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding in a case 7 asserting joint and several liability that “when different results as to different parties are 8 not logically inconsistent or contradictory, the rationale for the Frow rule is lacking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).