Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 7/10/1992

Brown-El v. Delo

Citations

  • 969 F.2d 644
  • 1992 WL 158537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prison officials may need to segregate inmates for non-punitive reasons pending investigation of misconduct charges
  • holding that prisoner’s claim that he was denied his Eighth Amendment rights when he was served cold food was frivolous
  • holding that prisoner's claim that he was denied his Eighth Amendment rights when he was served cold food was frivolous
  • holding that a claim of cold food, without more, is frivolous
  • recognizing inmate is entitled to counsel substitute only in limited situations
  • “We agree with the district court that Brown-El’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated when he was served cold food is frivolous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Heaney, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Brown-El v. Delo

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.