Brown-Crummer Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how a pattern of misconduct may be established where there are multiple RPC violations against separate clients over an extended period of time
• two-year suspension and two years' supervised probation for neglect of multiple client matters and not promptly providing a written response to requests by disciplinary counsel
• we give more weight to the Board’s sanctions than to those of the hearing officer
• two year suspension for multiple violations, including three violations of RPC 1.3 (diligence); three violations of RPC 1.4(a)(b) (communication); one violation of RPC 1.5(a) (reasonable fee); one violation of RPC 1.15(d) (refunding unearned fees
• \`an appeal of the disciplinary Board's decision carries with it the chance that we might increase the recommended sanction...'\ (quoting In re Discipline of Dann, 136 Wash.2d 67, 84-85, 960 P.2d 416 (1998))
• two year suspension for multiple violations, including three violations of RPC 1.3 (diligence); three violations of RPC 1.4(a), (b) (commu nication); one violation of RPC 1.5(a) (reasonable fee); one violation of RPC 1.15(d) (refunding unearned fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).