Brown & Brown v. Theresa A. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding factual dispute as to whether overbroad restrictive covenant could still be partially enforced
• describing the nature of the public policy implicated by the exception
• refused to enforce Florida’s non-compete statute because it was contrary to public policy and failed the “truly obnoxious test”
• noncompete covenants \strictly construed\ based on \powerful considerations of public policy . . . against sanctioning the loss of a livelihood\
• “[O]n this record and at this early stage of the action when little discovery has taken place, dismissal of the portion of the breach of contract claim based on the non-solicitation provision in the employment agreement is inappropriate.”
• “[O]n this record and at this early stage of the action when little discovery has taken place, dismissal [under the BDO Seidman standard] of the portion of the breach of contract claim based on the non-solicitation provision in the employment agreement is inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).