Skip to main content
· 2/6/1985

Brower v. Davidson, Deckert, Schutter & Glassman, P.C.

Citations

  • 686 S.W.2d 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring us to analyze the arguments of counsel in our harm analysis
  • the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent’s notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
  • the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent's notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
  • the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent’s notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
  • an erroneous jury charge does not result in automatic reversal of a conviction
  • requiring us to review voir dire in our harm analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shangler, P.J., and Kennedy and Lowenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.