· 2/6/1985
Brower v. Davidson, Deckert, Schutter & Glassman, P.C.
Citations
- 686 S.W.2d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring us to analyze the arguments of counsel in our harm analysis
- the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent’s notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
- the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent's notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
- the court held that the statute began to run upon issuance of the examining agent’s notice of a proposed deficiency even though specific amount of taxes owed had not been determined
- an erroneous jury charge does not result in automatic reversal of a conviction
- requiring us to review voir dire in our harm analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shangler, P.J., and Kennedy and Lowenstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.