· 9/22/1997
Brower v. Ackerley
Citations
- 943 P.2d 1141
- 88 Wash. App. 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that insomnia, severe stress, and an inability to function properly could constitute severe emotional distress
- issue not briefed or argued in trial court will need not be considered on appeal
- \No Washington case has incorporated [the objective symptomatology requirement] into the tort of outrage.\
- “No Washington case has incorporated [the objective symptomatology requirement] into the tort of outrage.”
- issues not briefed or argued in trial court will not be considered on appeal
- issue not briefed or argued in trial court will not be considered on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.