Skip to main content
· 9/22/1997

Brower v. Ackerley

Citations

  • 943 P.2d 1141
  • 88 Wash. App. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that insomnia, severe stress, and an inability to function properly could constitute severe emotional distress
  • issue not briefed or argued in trial court will need not be considered on appeal
  • \No Washington case has incorporated [the objective symptomatology requirement] into the tort of outrage.\
  • “No Washington case has incorporated [the objective symptomatology requirement] into the tort of outrage.”
  • issues not briefed or argued in trial court will not be considered on appeal
  • issue not briefed or argued in trial court will not be considered on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.