Skip to main content
· 5/19/1994

Broward County v. Patel

Citations

  • 641 So. 2d 40
  • 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269
  • 1994 Fla. LEXIS 742
  • 1994 WL 192212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an expert’s opinion which is unsupported by the evidence or law, or is misleading because it employs an improper methodology, is properly excluded
  • stating that the condemnee must demonstrate a reasonable probability that rezoning or a variance would be granted in the near future for it to be considered in the valuation of the condemned property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.