Skip to main content
· 5/15/1856

Brousseau v. Ship Hudson

Citations

  • 11 La. Ann. 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
  • finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vookhies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.