· 5/15/1856
Brousseau v. Ship Hudson
Citations
- 11 La. Ann. 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
- finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vookhies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.