Brotherton v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that Ohio Forestry bars substantive FLPMA challenges to Resource Management Plans absent further-substantive injury, but distinguishing NEPA challenges to an EIS
• requiring the BLM to consider all \reasonably foreseeable future actions\ with an impact on the resource being managed, including future timber sales proposed within the same district, as part of a cumulative impacts analysis within an EA
• requiring the BLM to consider all “reasonably foreseeable future actions” with an impact on the resource being managed, including future timber sales proposed within the same district, as part of a cumulative impacts analysis within an EA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).