Brothers v. Kern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “so long as funds were in the client trust account, they were still [the client’s] funds”
• holding that “so long as funds were in the client trust account, they were still [the client’s] funds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sherman v. Securities & Exchange Commission (In Re Sherman)
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 43×
• Macilwaine v. Macilwaine (In re Macilwaine)
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-08-22· cited 36×
• Plumas County Department of Child Support Services v. Rodriquez
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-04-22· cited 16×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-11-10· cited 2×
• Marriage of Macilwaine
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-08-22
• Sherman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-09-19
• Swan v. Hatchett
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-06-29
• Swan v. Hatchett
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-07-18

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
• Cheriton v. Fraser
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-09-14· cited 271×
• In Re Marriage of Drake
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-03-27· cited 141×
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  California Supreme Court· 1976-01-28· cited 130×
• Guigne v. Guigne
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-04-30· cited 74×
• In Re the Marriage of Catalano
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-09-13· cited 49×
• In Re Marriage of LaBass & Munsee
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-08-07· cited 49×
• In Re Marriage of Pearlstein
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-03-28· cited 36×
• In Re Marriage of Muldrow
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-08-19· cited 22×
• County of Stanislaus v. Gibbs
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-11-12· cited 16×