Skip to main content

Brothers v. Florence

Citations

  • 739 N.E.2d 733
  • 95 N.Y.2d 290
  • 716 N.Y.S.2d 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While interpretation must begin with an examination of the language itself, where a statute does not expressly address the issue, the reach of the statute ultimately becomes a matter of judgment made upon review of the legislative goal”
  • “When, however, a limitations period is statutorily shortened, or created where none existed before, Due Process requires that potential litigants be afforded a reasonable time for the commencement of an action before the bar takes effect.”
  • analyzing legislative history behind 1996 amendment to CPLR § 214(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brothers v. Florence

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.