Skip to main content
· 2/28/1990

Brotherhood of Railway Carmen (Division of Tcu) v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

Citations

  • 894 F.2d 1463
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1406
  • 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2761
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2694
  • 1990 WL 10612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “claims based on implied terms—specifically, the past practices of the parties . . . —do have some arguable basis sufficient to render this a minor dispute”
  • finding that “claims based on implied terms—specifically, the past practices of the parties . . .—do have some arguable basis sufficient to render this a minor dispute”
  • recognizing “two types of special circumstances in which federal courts may assert jurisdiction over cases that would otherwise involve minor disputes subject to compulsory arbitration under the RLA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Johnson, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.