Skip to main content
· 2/12/2004

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Citations

  • 358 F.3d 453
  • 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2292
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2314
  • 2004 WL 253556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the context of interpreting classes of controversy in railway labor disputes, [major and minor disputes] are not used in their ordinary sense; they are terms of art in the case law under the RLA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manion, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.