Skip to main content
· 10/24/2001

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

Citations

  • 270 F.3d 637
  • 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2699
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22850
  • 2001 WL 1266365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a dispute was “minor,” because it would “turn on the meaning” of a particular clause of the CBA in question
  • defining a “minor” dispute as one “involving interpretation and enforcement of existing CBAs”
  • “[I]f doubt arises about the classification of a dispute, the dispute is also considered to be minor.”
  • even applying the standards for a “facial” attack, the district court properly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction
  • “[I]f doubt arises about the classification of a dispute, the dispute is also considered to be minor.”
  • “there is no bright line to differentiate between major and minor disputes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Fagg, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.