Brosnan v. American Education Services (In Re Brosnan)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that debtor, a lawyer, did not maximize her income where she did not show she was unable to secure employment in other fields
• stating that “because Plaintiff did not demonstrate that she was unable to secure employment in other fields, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not maximized her income”
• applying first prong of Brunner test to conclude that lawyer who worked only 10 hours per week, and did not demonstrate she was unable to secure employment in other fields, failed to show she had maximized her income
• court held that debtor, a lawyer, did not maximize her income where she did not demonstrate that she was unable to secure employment in other fields

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).