Brookshire v. Harp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the failure to develop an adequate record provides “grounds for reversing the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to sentence four of Section 205(g), and ordering the case remanded for further proceedings”
• noting that when the record for evaluating a medical source opinion is not adequate, an ALJ must make every reasonable effort to fill that gap
• in which a treating psychiatrist’s opinion regarding claimant’s PTSD was discounted due to evidentiary inconsistency
• in which a treating psychiatrist's opinion regarding claimant's PTSD was discounted due to evidentiary inconsistency
• “Where a treating acceptable medical source co-signs a non-acceptable medical treating source's opinion, the resulting opinion constitutes that of both sources.”
• “Indeed, ’ the American Psychiatric Association- has moved away from the GAF system in recent years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).