Brookshire Bros. Holding, Inc. v. Dayco Products

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the amount of judicial resources invested in a litigation is a relevant consideration when determining whether to decline supplemental jurisdiction over pendant state law claims
• holding that district court abuses its discretion when it fails to exercise jurisdiction over remaining state law claims after “a significant amount of judicial resources” have been expended on the litigation
• noting that “the general rule is that a court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims when all federal- law claims are eliminated before trial”
• noting that “the general rule is that a court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims when all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial”
• explaining that, generally, “a court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims when all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial.”
• explaining that, generally, “a court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims when all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).