Skip to main content
· 10/6/1924

Brooks v. Wilson

Citations

  • 165 Ark. 477
  • 265 S.W. 53
  • 1924 Ark. LEXIS 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the proper basis for admitting evidence was not the basis expressed by the trial court, a trial court’s evidentiary ruling must be affirmed if it is right for any reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.