Skip to main content
· 4/13/1984

Brooks v. Tanner

Citations

  • 680 P.2d 343
  • 101 N.M. 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “each part of the contract is to be accorded significance according to its place in the contract”
  • refusing to adopt a proposed construction that would render meaningless an important contractual phrase
  • proof of prescriptive easement requires a showing by clear and convincing evidence of each element necessary to establish such easement, including that use was open and notorious for ten years or more
  • there is a strong constructional preference for appurtenant easements over easements in gross
  • burden on servient estate cannot be increased without consent of servient owner
  • burden on servient estate cannot be increased without consent of servient owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Federici, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.