Skip to main content

Brooks v. State

Citations

  • 827 S.W.2d 119
  • 308 Ark. 660
  • 1992 Ark. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “prejudice is clear” when a defendant is deprived of an opportunity to know the charges against him during trial
  • “dismissing the robbery charge and then reinstating it at the conclusion of all the evidence could well have curtailed the appellant’s ability to present a full defense to this charge”
  • \dismissing the robbery charge and then reinstating it at the conclusion of all the evidence could well have curtailed the appellant's ability to present a full defense to this charge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.