Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/18/1997
Brooks v. State
Citations
- 481 S.E.2d 712
- 325 S.C. 269
- 1997 S.C. LEXIS 44
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The trial judge was not bound to accept the negotiated sentence reached by the State and respondent.”
- “A trial judge is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits.”
- \A [plea court] is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits.\
- \A trial [court] is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits.\
- \A trial judge is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits. A sentence is not excessive if it is within statutory limitations and there are no facts supporting an allegation of prejudice against a defendant.\ (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Finney, Moore, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roddy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 33×
- In re M.B.H.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19· cited 26×
- State v. BrouwerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 11×
- State v. RikardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 7×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-08-02· cited 6×
- In Re MBHSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-06-02
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.