Brooks v. Shepherd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the government’s separate settlement and release of claims, extinguishing relator’s claims, was an alternate remedy
• recognizing that a settlement agreement in a separate qui tam action may extinguish a qui tam plaintiffs claims and holding that such a settlement was an “alternate remedy” under Section 3730(c)(5) of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2012)
• recognizing that a settlement 13 agreement in a separate qui tam action may extinguish a qui tam plaintiff’s claims and 14 holding that such a settlement was an “alternate remedy” under Section 3730(c)(5) 15 of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733 (2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).