Brooks v. Shanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prison officials must notify prisoners of the potential deprivation of good-time credits before the prison disciplinary hearing
• holding that earned good time credits under § 33-2-34 were an entitlement that could only be divested by following statutory and administrative procedures
• holding that the good-time credits statutes “confer an entitlement to good-time credits and that this entitlement may be divested only when the statutory and administrative procedures relating to those credits have been followed”
• stating that when a habeas corpus petition alleges the wrongful deprivation of good time credits, courts should determine whether the deprivation satisfied due process requirements
• stating that when a habeas corpus petition alleges the wrongful deprivation of good-time credits, courts should determine whether the deprivation satisfied due process requirements
• stating that “there are a number of good time credits that a prisoner may accrue“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).