Brooks v. Mastin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the intentional aiding and abetting in the interference of parental rights to be an actionable tort in New Hampshire
• permitting recovery of damages for intentional interference with parent’s custodial relationship with his/her child based upon highly regarded right of parent to custody of his/her child
• permitting recovery of damages for intentional interference with parent's custodial relationship with his/her child based upon highly regarded right of parent to custody of his/her child
• in context of custody dispute, court refused to recognize tort as not in best interest of child
• a person may be liable for damages on a conspiracy theory for combining with another to commit a civil wrong
• New Hampshire Supreme Court of the opinion that a claim for the intentional infliction of emotional distress should be treated as a separate tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).