Skip to main content
· 1/30/1951

Brooks v. Hunkin-Conkey Const. Co.

Citations

  • 95 F. Supp. 608
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he practice is an improper one. ... It gives the juror taking notes an undue influence in discussing the case when he appeals to his notes to settle conflicts of memory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.