· 6/13/2002
Brooks v. Friedman
Citations
- 769 N.E.2d 696
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 999
- 2002 WL 1292805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that once foundational requirements are met, “[t]he finder of fact is entitled to weigh and determine the credibility to be accorded the expert’s opinion” based on, among other things, the extent of the expert’s experience and expertise
- “While Friedman did present evidence to refute Brooks’ sudden emergency argument, Brooks did present evidence to support each of the three prerequisites. Whether or not that evidence was believable or entitled to much weight was for the jury to decide, not the trial court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ratliff, Sullivan, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.