Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the 2011 amendment “replaced qui tam actions under § 292(b) with a compensatory cause of action for any person who has suffered a competitive injury as a result of a false marking violation.”
• the statute at issue had no quid-pro-quo language and did not promise any protection in the event of an amendment to the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).