Skip to main content
· 6/1/2010

Brooks v. District Hospital Partners, L.P.

Citations

  • 606 F.3d 800
  • 391 U.S. App. D.C. 32
  • 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 648
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 11034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that individuals listed in attachments to a formal EEO complaint exhausted their administrative remedies, where the complainant filed the complaint on behalf of herself and similarly situated individuals, including individuals listed in the attachments
  • explaining that the single filing rule does not apply unless a party has been properly joined to the suit brought by the original filer
  • noting that Rule 21 “authorizes severance of claims into distinct actions”
  • individuals included in a list attached to a complaint were included within the complainant’s reference to similarly situated individuals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Brown, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.