Brooks v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alleged deprivation “of fair criminal proceedings” by way of fabricated evidence and other things did not state a due process claim
• “[A]ny arguments . . . raised for the first time in [a] motion to recon- sider are waived.” (citation omitted)
• “[A]ny arguments ... raised for the first time in [a] motion to reconsider are waived.”
• “The existence of an outstanding warrant supports probable cause for an arrest.” (citing United States v. Thornton, 463 F.3d 693, 698 (7th Cir. 2006) and Juriss, 957 F.2d at 350)
• \[A]ny arguments...raised for the first time in [a] motion to reconsider are waived.\
• “A plaintiff cannot state a due process claim by combining what are essentially claims for false arrest under the Fourth Amendment and state law malicious prosecution into a sort of hybrid substantive due process claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).