Brooks v. Byers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the Administrative Record should include all relevant documents” relating to the procurement process at issue
• holding protestor had standing because it had been “deprived of the opportunity to compete”
• issuing a preliminary injunction after finding that plaintiff had made a prima facie showing of a violation of the Competition in Contracting Act and relevant FAR provisions
• “[T]he Administrative Record should include all relevant documents” relating to the procurement process at issue
• “ ‘it is sufficient for standing purposes if the plaintiff shows that it likely would have competed for the contract had the government publicly invited bids or requested proposals.’ ”
• “ ‘[Deprivation of an opportunity to compete is sufficient economic harm to demonstrate prejudice for purposes of standing.’ ” (citing Magnum Opus Techs., Inc. v. United States, 94 Fed.Cl. 512, 533 (2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).