Brooks v. A. M. F., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in the context of a health-insurer's intervention claim that an employee \reimbursed twice for the same expense ... is unjustly enriched\
• “[T]o leave an intervenor [excluded from participating in settlement negotiations] with no remedy other than to ... undertake the burden of proving that the injury was work related is not the type of protection which strikes a proper balance of the interests of all parties concerned”
• “[T]o leave an intervenor [excluded from participating in settlement negotiations] with no remedy other than to . . . undertake the burden of proving that the injury was work related is not the type of protection which strikes a proper balance of the interests of all parties concerned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).