Skip to main content
· 11/1/1999

Brooklyn Institute of Arts & Sciences v. City of New York

Citations

  • 64 F. Supp. 2d 184
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16709
  • 1999 WL 989081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Contract is unequiv- ocal that the City has no ownership rights with respect to any of the collections in the Museum.”
  • “An ejectment action is [not] a ‘civil enforcement proceeding.’”
  • “There USCA11 Case: 22-12863 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 10/27/2023 Page: 16 of 17 4 Jordan, J., Concurring in the judgment 22-12863 is also no language in the Lease or Contract that gives the Mayor or the City the right to veto works chosen for exhibition by the Museum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gershon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.