Brookins v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “Siefken rule” where plaintiff “needed or requested no accommodation” and failed to control a controllable disability
• declining to obligate an employer who provides accommodations \above and beyond\ those necessary under the ADA to continue those services indefinitely, noting that it would \effectively punish[]\ the employer for exceeding the ADA's \reasonable accommodation\ requirements
• noting, following jury trial finding for employer, that the EEOC recognizes “[s]ince reasonable accommodation is always prospective, an employer is not required to excuse past misconduct even if it is the result of the individual's disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).