Skip to main content
· 10/25/2002

Brooke v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Citations

  • 828 So. 2d 1078
  • 2002 WL 31398610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing dismissal of plaintiffs complaint based on the expiration of the statute of limitations because the facts necessary to determine the statute of limitations defense were not apparent on the face of the complaint and its attachments
  • reversing dismissal of plaintiff's complaint based on the expiration of the statute of limitations because the facts necessary to determine the statute of limitations defense were not apparent on the face of the complaint and its attachments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.