Brook v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conjecture that opportunity to review “homicide file” might yield exculpatory evidence is inadequate to demonstrate good cause for discovery
• holding that speculation that production of requested documents might reveal exculpatory evidence is insufficient to establish good cause for discovery
• holding that conjecture that an opportunity to review \homicide file\ might yield exculpatory evidence is inadequate to demonstrate good cause for discovery
• holding that claim alleging trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to request a particular jury charge lacks arguable merit where the defendant was not legally entitled to such charge
• holding that showing of good cause under Rule 902(E)(2) “requires more than just a generic demand for potentially exculpatory evidence”
• holding that a showing of good cause under Rule 902(E)(2) “requires more than just a generic demand for potentially exculpatory evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).