Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon
Citations
- 230 Conn. App. 424
Syllabus
The defendant tenant appealed from the trial court's judgment for the plain- tiff landlord in the plaintiff's summary process action. The defendant claimed, inter alia, that the court improperly concluded that her residential lease with the plaintiff had terminated because a specific provision of the lease agreement did not operate to automatically renew the lease. Held: The trial court properly determined that the defendant's residential lease with the plaintiff had terminated, as the language of the lease was clear and unambiguous as a matter of law. Argued September 17, 2024—officially released January 28, 2025
Judges: Elgo; Suarez; DiPentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-26· cited 100×
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-30· cited 80×
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-18· cited 67×
- Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-23· cited 39×
- O'Brien Properties, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-19· cited 33×
- Connecticut National Bank v. Rehab AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-03-08· cited 19×
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. VaszilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-11· cited 14×
- Raczkowski v. McFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-01-21· cited 5×
- Cohen v. Postal Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-07-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.