Bronstein v. Kalcheim & Kalcheim, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing as premature plaintiffs malpractice complaint against attorneys for negligent tax advice, since issuance of a notice of deficiency did not establish plaintiff had suffered a loss; plaintiff would have actionable damages only after a liability determination was made by tax court
• dismissing as premature plaintiff's malpractice complaint against attorneys for negligent tax advice, since issuance of a Notice of Deficiency did not establish plaintiff had suffered a loss; plaintiff would have actionable damages only after a liability determination was made by Tax Court
• Plaintiff’s malpractice action was premature because his tax liability had not yet been determined in tax court. Thus, he had not yet suffered any actual loss as a result of his attorney’s actions.
• Plaintiff's malpractice action was premature because his tax liability had not yet been determined in tax court. Thus, he had not yet suffered any actual loss as a result of his attorney's actions.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).