Bronstein v. Board of Registration in Optometry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 15 percent rent provision for gross receipts over $500,000 did not constitute illegal fee-splitting
• case moot where administrative board agreed not to enforce order that was no longer in compliance with amended statute
• “Litigation is considered moot when the party who claimed to be aggrieved ceases to have a personal stake in its outcome . . . Speculative fear of future litigation, however, does not save a case from being moot”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).