Skip to main content
· 10/13/2004

Bronco Wine Company v. Jolly

Citations

  • 95 P.3d 422
  • 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 180
  • 33 Cal. 4th 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the party arguing federal preemption of a state statute has the burden of demonstrating preemption
  • upholding California restrictions on the use of the word “Napa” on wine bottles against preemption challenge even where such use was permitted by federal law
  • upholding California restrictions on the use of the word “Napa” on wine bottles against preemption challenge even where such use was permitted by federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.