· 10/13/2004
Bronco Wine Company v. Jolly
Citations
- 95 P.3d 422
- 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 180
- 33 Cal. 4th 943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the party arguing federal preemption of a state statute has the burden of demonstrating preemption
- upholding California restrictions on the use of the word “Napa” on wine bottles against preemption challenge even where such use was permitted by federal law
- upholding California restrictions on the use of the word “Napa” on wine bottles against preemption challenge even where such use was permitted by federal law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.