Bromwell v. Lombardi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ORR's responsibility for the care, custody, and placement of UACs is not limited to the pendency of immigration proceedings
• finding that the statutes reflect “Congress’s unmistakable desire to protect [the] vulnerable group” of unaccompanied minors
• recognizing this right along with the reciprocal right held by children “to be raised and nurtured by their parents” (citing Berman v. Young, 291 F.3d 976, 983 (7th Cir. 2002))
• applying the statutory construction rule that “the specific terms of a statutory scheme govern the general ones,” and concluding that § 1232(c)(2
• requiring “notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case” to comply with due process (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining the canon of statutory construction providing that the specific terms of a statute defeat the general, absent indications of contrary legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).