Bromley v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts have regularly taken judicial notice of administrative complaints in resolving a motion to dismiss when no party disputes their authenticity and collecting cases
• noting that courts should exercise an “‘abundance of caution’ before relying on materials outside the pleadings” (citation omitted)
• noting that even an agency’s deliberate withholding of certain documents would not support tolling the deadline
• noting that courts take judicial notice of Final Agency Decisions for exhaustion purposes without converting to summary judgment where the authenticity of the public document is not disputed
• taking judicial notice of administrative complaint materials in ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
• taking judicial notice of an agency decision to determine the date on which the plaintiff filed her administrative claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).