Bromante v. Bromante

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in determining that the wife did not have the need for fees, the trial court erred in considering $5000 that she borrowed from her father

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Holland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-10· cited 20×
• Monsanto v. Monsanto
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-20· cited 19×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 16×
• Huntley v. Huntley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-03· cited 11×
• Mott v. Mott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-16· cited 9×
• Schmachtenberg v. Schmachtenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 8×
• Burrill v. Burrill
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 7×
• Bond v. Bond
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-16· cited 3×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-17· cited 2×
• Firuza Sarazin v. Ratko John Sarazin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-05· cited 1×
• WILLIAM WHITTAKER v. AMY S. WHITTAKER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-11-17
• George Gonzalez v. Dayami Rodriguez Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-08-13

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Azzarelli v. Pupello
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-27· cited 9×