Skip to main content
· 4/30/1998

Brokenshire v. Rivas and Rivas, Ltd.

Citations

  • 957 P.2d 157
  • 327 Or. 119
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim of error appeared for first time in defendant’s opening brief in Court of Appeals
  • claim of error appeared for first time in defendant's opening brief in Court of Appeals
  • expert testimony on computing present value of damage award for future losses is admissible, but not necessary
  • “Both plaintiff and defendant would have been allowed, but were not required, to pres- ent expert testimony to advise the jury about the performance of the appropri- ate computation and the different assumptions that may be made to guide that computation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen Kulongoski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.