· 4/30/1998
Brokenshire v. Rivas and Rivas, Ltd.
Citations
- 957 P.2d 157
- 327 Or. 119
- 1998 Ore. LEXIS 349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claim of error appeared for first time in defendant’s opening brief in Court of Appeals
- claim of error appeared for first time in defendant's opening brief in Court of Appeals
- expert testimony on computing present value of damage award for future losses is admissible, but not necessary
- “Both plaintiff and defendant would have been allowed, but were not required, to pres- ent expert testimony to advise the jury about the performance of the appropri- ate computation and the different assumptions that may be made to guide that computation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen Kulongoski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.