· 10/31/1990
Broeckert v. Sullivan
Citations
- 751 F. Supp. 1361
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16902
- 1990 WL 200075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “benefit statements routinely sent with benefit checks cannot reasonably be classified as an interpretation of the Act or its regulations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shabaz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.