Skip to main content
· 10/31/1990

Broeckert v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 751 F. Supp. 1361
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16902
  • 1990 WL 200075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “benefit statements routinely sent with benefit checks cannot reasonably be classified as an interpretation of the Act or its regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shabaz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.