Skip to main content
· 8/18/1995

Broeckel v. State

Citations

  • 900 P.2d 1205
  • 1995 Alas. App. LEXIS 42
  • 1995 WL 495792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant need only show that their attorney incompetently failed to preserve their right to appeal in order for that right to be automatically restored
  • although the defendant's family retained counsel after sentencing, appointed trial counsel did not attempt to formally withdraw, as required, and had no authority to unilaterally withdraw from representation; thus, trial counsel had an ongoing duty toward his client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.