Brody v. Barasch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that due process requires that “[a] statute must be sufficiently clear to give a person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is proscribed”
• finding sufficient connection between applicant’s misrepresentations on his resume and his professional fitness to justify denial of psychologist-doctorate license
• rejecting argument that term “financial irresponsibility” was unconstitutionally vague when applied to defendant’s conduct
• “Statutory language that conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices will satisfy due process.”
• not necessary to “detail each and every act or conduct that is prohibited” as long as language “conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices”
• not necessary to “detail each and every act or conduct that is prohibited” as long as language “conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).