· 5/22/1937
Brodtmann v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
Citations
- 90 F.2d 1
- 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3744
- 1937 A.M.C. 1049
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that amendments to the FCA “actually 19 increased, rather than decreased, executive control over qui tam lawsuits”
- adopting a rational-relation test for reviewing the government’s motion to dismiss a qui tam lawsuit
- rejecting the contention that lack of merit is the exclusive ground on which the government can seek dismissal
- approving of district court’s consideration of “the burden imposed on the taxpayers by its litigation” and “internal staff costs” the government would occur with relator’s litigation
- requiring the government to meet the valid purpose and rational relationship standard
- evidence that problems with lemon marketing were “potentially as pervasive” as those in orange industry was sufficient to extend dismissal to lemon industry action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hutcheson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.