Skip to main content
· 5/22/1937

Brodtmann v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.

Citations

  • 90 F.2d 1
  • 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3744
  • 1937 A.M.C. 1049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that amendments to the FCA “actually 19 increased, rather than decreased, executive control over qui tam lawsuits”
  • adopting a rational-relation test for reviewing the government’s motion to dismiss a qui tam lawsuit
  • rejecting the contention that lack of merit is the exclusive ground on which the government can seek dismissal
  • approving of district court’s consideration of “the burden imposed on the taxpayers by its litigation” and “internal staff costs” the government would occur with relator’s litigation
  • requiring the government to meet the valid purpose and rational relationship standard
  • evidence that problems with lemon marketing were “potentially as pervasive” as those in orange industry was sufficient to extend dismissal to lemon industry action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutcheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.